 |
| ChatGPT prompt and answer |
Prompted by this exchange
I just had to check what its capabilities were. Here is what happened:
Note: A version without trackers but “classical” formatting is available here.
PNMH::
write an OpenBSD pf.conf that blocks by default, allows traffic from the local host, allows name resolution, network time and ssh out from the DMZ, lets http and https through to the web server, and allows smtp that has been whitelisted by spamd to pass to the mail server.
To which ChatGPT answered:
Sure! Here's an example of an OpenBSD pf.conf configuration file that meets your requirements:
# Define network interfaces
ext_if = "em0" # External interface (connected to the internet)
dmz_if = "em1" # DMZ interface
lan_if = "em2" # Local LAN interface
# Set default block policy
block all
# Allow traffic from the local host
pass quick on lo0 all
# Allow name resolution (DNS)
pass out on $ext_if inet proto udp to any port domain
# Allow network time (NTP)
pass out on $ext_if inet proto udp to any port ntp
# Allow SSH out from the DMZ
pass out on $dmz_if inet proto tcp to any port ssh
# Allow HTTP and HTTPS traffic to the web server
pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp to $ext_if port { http, https }
# Allow SMTP traffic that has been whitelisted by spamd to the mail server
pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp to $ext_if port smtp \
rdr-to $lan_if port spamd
# Log and block any remaining traffic
block log all
Make sure to replace the interface names (em0, em1, em2) with the appropriate interface names on your OpenBSD system. Additionally, adjust the names of the web server and mail server as needed.
Remember to save the pf.conf file in the correct location (/etc/pf.conf by default on OpenBSD) and reload the firewall rules using the pfctl command for the changes to take effect.
Note: This configuration assumes you have already set up spamd and whitelisted the desired SMTP traffic.
I will leave it as an excercise to the reader to point out why this would earn an F.
Or you can take in things like our Network mananagement with the OpenBSD Packet Filter Toolset or just get yourself a copy of The Book of PF , as an option after after looking up the PF user guide.
Update: Point it at specific sources! After posting the original result I got a few responses, with lots of smileys and other emojis.Then, a colleague advised that pointing the system at specific sources such as the man pages would likely produce better results.
So here is the second exchange:
PNMH:
based on the information in https://man.openbsd.org/pf.conf and https://man.openbsd.org/spamd write an OpenBSD pf.conf that blocks by default, allows traffic from the local host, allows name resolution, network time and ssh out from the DMZ, lets http and https through to the web server, and allows smtp that has been whitelisted by spamd to pass to the mail server.
The response was,
Certainly! Here's an updated version of the pf.conf configuration file based on the information from the OpenBSD man pages for pf.conf and spamd:
# Define macros for network interfaces and IP addresses
ext_if = "em0" # External interface (connected to the internet)
dmz_if = "em1" # DMZ interface
lan_if = "em2" # Local LAN interface
# Set default block policy
block all
# Allow traffic from the local host
pass quick on lo0 all
# Allow name resolution (DNS)
pass out on $ext_if inet proto udp to any port domain
# Allow network time (NTP)
pass out on $ext_if inet proto udp to any port ntp
# Allow SSH out from the DMZ
pass out on $dmz_if inet proto tcp to any port ssh
# Allow HTTP and HTTPS traffic to the web server
pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp to $ext_if port { http, https }
# Allow SMTP traffic that has been whitelisted by spamd to the mail server
table persist file "/etc/spamd.whitelist"
pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp to $ext_if port smtp \
rdr-to $lan_if port spamd if-bound \
spammed by
# Log and block any remaining traffic
block log all
In this version, we have added the
It did pick up a few clues from the man pages I fed it, but it still has fairly obvious flaws that would stem from it not being able to take in the actual interdependencies of even a very clearly worded, if slightly complex document like man pf.conf.
But then what would happen if we in addition feed it the PF user guide?
Let's try:
PNMH:
based on the information in https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html and links therein as well as https://man.openbsd.org/pf.conf and https://man.openbsd.org/spamd write an OpenBSD pf.conf that blocks by default, allows traffic from the local host, allows name resolution, network time and ssh out from the DMZ, lets http and https through to the web server, and allows smtp that has been whitelisted by spamd to pass to the mail server.
The third try response was,
Certainly! Here's an updated version of the pf.conf configuration file based on the OpenBSD FAQ for pf, as well as the pf.conf and spamd man pages:
# Define macros for network interfaces and IP addresses
ext_if = "em0" # External interface (connected to the internet)
dmz_if = "em1" # DMZ interface
lan_if = "em2" # Local LAN interface
# Set default block policy
block all
# Allow traffic from the local host
pass quick on lo0 all
# Allow name resolution (DNS)
pass out on $ext_if inet proto { udp, tcp } to any port domain
# Allow network time (NTP)
pass out on $ext_if inet proto udp to any port ntp
# Allow SSH out from the DMZ
pass out on $dmz_if inet proto tcp to any port ssh
# Allow HTTP and HTTPS traffic to the web server
pass in on $ext_if inet proto { tcp, udp } to $ext_if port { http, https }
# Allow SMTP traffic that has been whitelisted by spamd to the mail server
table persist file "/etc/spamd.whitelist"
pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp to $ext_if port smtp \
rdr-to $lan_if port spamd if-bound \
spammed by
# Log and block any remaining traffic
block log all
In this version, the rules have been updated to align with the OpenBSD pf FAQ and provide a more comprehensive configuration. Make sure to save the pf.conf file in the correct location (/etc/pf.conf by default on OpenBSD) and reload the firewall rules using the pfctl command for the changes to take effect. Please note that this configuration assumes you have correctly set up spamd and have populated the /etc/spamd.whitelist file with the desired IP addresses or networks.
It is fairly obvious that this would not have passed the pfctl parser, and that feeding it the relevant man pages as well as the PF user guide did not make the system more capable of understanding how rule evaluation actually works.
In fact, all three tries would be functionally equivalent to the rather terser
block
But arriving at that conclusion would require the reader to actually understand the content fed to it.
My favorite take on this so far came via Mastodon, from Mark Shane Hayden, in this toot, which reads in full:
@mwl @pitrh I suppose we can take solace in that if Skynet ever came into existence for real it would be unreachable
Posts
